Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherBrowse by ChannelAbout the NetworkJoin the NetworkProductsSub-MenuProducts OverviewBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAbout UsContactSubscribeSupport
Book a Demo
Search
Close

FinCEN Issues Proposed Rule to Enhance Financial Institutions’ AML/CFT Programs

By Daniel C. McKay, II, James W. Morrissey, Jennifer Durham King, Mark C. Svalina, Kelly Miller & Nicholas S. Zlevor on July 2, 2024
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Banking System
Banking System and Electronic Transfer for Business

On June 28, 2024, in an effort to bolster financial institutions’ anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (“AML/CFT”) programs, the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) issued a proposed rule that would enumerate the minimum components required to be included within financial institutions’ AML/CFT programs. The types of financial institutions that would be affected by the proposed rule include banks, casinos, money services businesses, brokers-dealers, mutual funds, insurance companies, futures commission merchants and introducing brokers in commodities, operators of credit card systems and loan or finance companies. At a high level, the proposed rule would require AML/CFT programs to contain a mandatory risk assessment process and compel financial institutions to incorporate FinCEN’s government-wide AML/CFT priorities into risk-based programs. A financial institution’s risk assessment process would need to involve the identification, evaluation and documentation of its risks related to money laundering, the financing of terrorism and other illicit finance activity, based on its particular business activities (e.g., products, services, distribution channels, customers, intermediaries and geographic locations).

While FinCEN is encouraging commenters to provide input on all aspects of the proposed rule, it is specifically seeking responses to, among others, the following questions:

  1. Are there other approaches for a financial institution to identify, manage and mitigate illicit finance activity risks aside from a risk assessment process?
  2. Should a risk assessment process be required to take into account additional or different criteria or risks than those listed in the proposed rule?
  3. Should financial institutions be required to update their risk assessment using the process proposed in the rule, at a regular, specified interval (such as annually or every two years) or based on triggers such as the introduction of new products, services, distribution channels, customer categories, intermediaries or geographies?
  4. The proposed rule would require financial institutions to consider the reports they file pursuant to 31 CFR Chapter X as a component of the risk assessment process.  To what extent do financial institutions currently leverage Bank Secrecy Act reporting to identify and assess risk?  Are there additional factors that should be considered with regard to this proposed requirement?

Written comments on the proposed rule, which can be found here, must be submitted to FinCEN on or before September 1, 2024.  If you have any questions concerning the above, please contact your attorney at Vedder Price or one of the authors.

Photo of Daniel C. McKay, II Daniel C. McKay, II
Read more about Daniel C. McKay, IIEmail
Photo of James W. Morrissey James W. Morrissey
Read more about James W. MorrisseyEmail
Photo of Jennifer Durham King Jennifer Durham King
Read more about Jennifer Durham KingEmail
Photo of Mark C. Svalina Mark C. Svalina
Read more about Mark C. SvalinaEmail
  • Posted in:
    Financial
  • Blog:
    The 21st Century Banker
  • Organization:
    Vedder Price PC
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status

New to the Network

  • Agha Law blog
  • Woven Legal Blog
  • Bid Protests
  • Contract Claims
  • Federal Procurement
Copyright © 2024, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo